myspace tracker admin – Page 225 – My Blog

admin

Celebrity Hunted star reveals abusive relationship saying strangers would stop her in street and beg her to leave him

CELEBRITY Hunted star Chloe Veitch has revealed her abusive relationship with an ex, saying strangers would stop her in the street and beg her to leave him.

Chloe, 25, who competed on the Channel 4 show in 2018, spoke candidly about her experience, shedding light on the toxic dynamic she once found herself trapped in.

Woman speaking into a microphone, saying "But I love him."
TikTok / @harryjowsey
Chloe Veitch has revealed her abusive relationship with an ex, saying strangers would stop her in the street and beg her to leave him[/caption]
Chloe Veitch at the 11th Annual American Reality Television Awards.
Getty
Chloe has shared her story to help others[/caption]

Ensuring to keep the person’s identity private, she told Harry Jowsey on his Boyfriend Material podcast, she said: “Towards the end of the relationship, it would be full-blown arguments.

“It got physical, like in front of people, to the point where people would run up to me in the street crying and say, like, ‘Why are you with this guy?’ And I’m like, ‘But I love him.'”

She admitted that she hadn’t anticipated she would find herself in such a situation, saying: “I never thought I would be that girl. But it didn’t just happen overnight. It was the small red flags that turn into that end result.”

Chloe hopes that sharing her story can serve as a warning to others who might find themselves in similar positions.

She continued: “So I think if there’s anyone that’s listening that can learn from this experience, this isn’t just a moment for me to gossip. This is genuine realisation of me, understanding like this isn’t acceptable at all, at any part.”

The Too Hot To Handle alum urged others to recognise warning signs in their own relationships, saying, “It doesn’t have to be he raises his hand for you to leave. You should be aware of the signs because you can see them.”

Chloe has also been grieving the sudden loss of her close friend, RuPaul’s Drag Race UK winner The Vivienne, real name James Lee Williams, who passed away aged 32.

The pair starred together on Celebrity Hunted in 2022 and remained close friends.

Chloe recently shared her heartbreak on Instagram, posting a screenshot of their final messages on WhatsApp.

In the exchange, James had invited her to visit, writing: “Come and stay for a few days when you can.”

Chloe replied: “Yeah, that sounds good. I’m not doing anything next weekend. I wanna come see you.”

James explained: “I’m not free until the 5th then have a week off. Just got home xxx.”

Chloe responded: “OK babe, I’ll come see you for a couple of nights after the 5th.”

Captioning the screenshot, Chloe wrote: “I’m gonna miss you so much, James.”

She also shared a touching photo of the pair, adding: “You were the light in everyone’s life,” alongside a clip of their time on Celebrity Hunted.

Chloe included a poignant quote in her tribute: “If you have the chance to make people happy, just do it. Sometimes people are struggling silently. Maybe your act of kindness can make their day.”

James’ publicist, Simon Jones, confirmed the tragic news last month, saying: “It is with immense sadness that we announce our beloved James Lee Williams – The Vivienne – passed away suddenly this weekend.

“James was an incredibly loved, warm-hearted, and amazing person. Their family is heartbroken by the loss of their son, brother, and uncle.

“They are so proud of the wonderful things James achieved in their life and career.”

The Vivienne and Chloe Veitch from Celebrity Hunted.
Colin Hutton
She competed on Celebrity Hunted 2018 with The Vivienne[/caption]

HOW YOU CAN GET HELP:

Women's Aid has this advice for victims and their families:

  • Always keep your phone nearby.
  • Get in touch with charities for help, including the Women’s Aid live chat helpline and services such as SupportLine.
  • If you are in danger, call 999.
  • Familiarise yourself with the Silent Solution, reporting abuse without speaking down the phone, instead dialing “55”.
  • Always keep some money on you, including change for a pay phone or bus fare.
  • If you suspect your partner is about to attack you, try to go to a lower-risk area of the house – for example, where there is a way out and access to a telephone.
  • Avoid the kitchen and garage, where there are likely to be knives or other weapons. Avoid rooms where you might become trapped, such as the bathroom, or where you might be shut into a cupboard or other small space.

If you are a ­victim of domestic abuse, SupportLine is open Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday from 6pm to 8pm on 01708 765200. The charity’s email support ­service is open weekdays and weekends during the crisis – messageinfo@supportline.org.uk.

Women’s Aid provides a live chat service – available weekdays from 8am-6pm and weekends 10am-6pm.

You can also call the freephone 24-hour ­National Domestic Abuse Helpline on 0808 2000 247.

Chloe from Ex On The Beach crying and leaving a party.
MTV
She found fame on Netflix’s Too Hot To Handle[/caption]

Read More »

Arsenal vs Man City referee appointment lacks common sense – Gunners fans are right to be unhappy

THE appointment of Peter Bankes for the power-keg Premier League showdown between Arsenal and Manchester City lacks common sense.

Gunners fans are up in arms because Bankes is from Merseyside and has an affiliation with the Liverpool County Football Association.

Gabriel of Arsenal and Erling Haaland of Manchester City during a Premier League match.
ALAMY
Arsenal face Manchester City in a crucial Premier League clash at the Emirates[/caption]
Referee Peter Bankes at an Aston Villa v West Ham United Premier League match.
REX
Peter Bankes has been appointed the referee for the match[/caption]
Referee speaking with Aston Villa's Youri Tielemans.
GETTY
Gunners fans are up in arms as Bankes is from Merseyside and has an affiliation with the Liverpool County Football Association[/caption]

And I believe the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) have brought undue pressure on Bankes and themselves with the appointment for today’s Emirates clash with Arsenal vying with Liverpool in the title race.

In the wake of Michael Oliver receiving death threats and abuse after he wrongly sent off Arsenal‘s Myles Lewis-Skelly in the 1-0 win at Wolves last weekend, refs’ chiefs have made an unnecessary appointment.

They are not helping themselves.

The game is big enough because of the huge rivalry as outlined by Arsenal captain Martin Odegaard.

But the appointment will only increase the pressure on Bankes.

I would never question the integrity of any match official.

But if anything happens then Bankes will be in the firing line.

Arsenal fans are already fuming over Oliver’s decision to dismiss Lewis-Skelly.

JOIN SUN VEGAS: GET £50 BONUS

But VAR Darren England and then the PGMOL were more to blame.

England should have intervened at Molineux and then there was no reason for the PGMOL to back a decision which was clearly incorrect.

The statement to support the red card only inflamed the situation.

I saw Gary Neville accuse Mikel Arteta of fuelling Arsenal fans’ growing hostility towards referees but I disagree.

If Prem officials got decisions right on a consistent basis then the majority of supporters would have no complaints.

Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme – Sun Club.

MARK HALSEY: Questions have to be asked of VAR after Lewis-Skelly sending off... here's what SHOULD have happened

By Mark Halsey

VAR Darren England should have recommended a review as soon as referee Michael Oliver showed Arsenal’s Myles Lewis-Skelly a straight red card for his challenge on Wolves’ Matt Doherty.

An official has to decide whether the challenge was careless or reckless — careless is a free-kick only, reckless is a yellow card — or worthy of a red card.

When a player lunges at an opponent with one or two feet from the front, the side or from the back which endangers the player’s safety with excess force or/and brutality, it must be sanctioned with a red.

I saw it as a reckless challenge worthy of a yellow, not a red.

So why did Darren not recommend a review? Once the red card was shown, the VAR should have intervened.

If Michael had the opportunity to view the challenge again, I’m sure he would have changed his mind, cancelled the red card and issued a yellow.

As for Arsenal fans’ views that Michael is biased against them, I’m not buying into that. You can never question the integrity of a match official and Michael is one of our best referees.

Officials cannot get everything right and that is why we have VAR to help. So questions have to be asked of Darren.

With the second yellow for Joao Gomes after catching Jurrien Timber on the ankle, you could argue that was a worse challenge than the Lewis-Skelly one.

Read More »

Mystery as massive PORN pictures are nailed to trees in beautiful woodland retreat where kids are taken to play

X-RATED photos showing a couple having sex have been nailed to a tree in a popular woods where parents take their kids to play.

The eye-popping snaps were spotted along a countryside woodland trail by a couple on an afternoon stroll on January 27.

Pornographic photos nailed to a tree.
The snaps were found in Hameldon Woods, a popular hiking spot near Burnley, Lancashire
Weathered Hameldon Woods sign.
Jonny Dillon
A couple spotted three pictures nailed to trees while out for a stroll[/caption]
A censored image of explicit photographs pinned to a tree.
They depicted a couple having sex and a woman with her private parts on show

Erica Blake and husband Dylan were shocked by the naughty images showing a man and woman engaging in sexual activity Hameldon Woods near Burnley, Lancashire.

They were stopped in their tracks by the three explicit photos showing a couple having sex and a woman exposing her privates.

The shots were screwed and nailed to a tree next to a public footpath where families with children walk by.

One photo shows a naked blonde woman lying down exposing her privates and another picture shows her on top of a man.

The wooded beauty spot is a popular magnet for dog walkers, horse riders, mountain bikers and families.

Dad-of-two Dylan, 47, said: “It was totally bizarre. We stopped off to have some tomato soup from a flask.

“We turned around and there they were, bold as brass. I shouted ‘oh my god’ and Erica jumped out of her skin.

“It put us right off our soup and roll.

“Who would put something like that in the middle of a wood? There are some strange people out there.

“It was shocking and a bit disturbing to be honest.

“They look like they had been there for some time as they were fading.”

The couple had been walking around the woods and decided to stop for a cup of soup from their flask.

Dylan said: “We found a spot out of the wind and walked towards some bushes.

“We turned around and there in front of us were these porn pictures.

“They were screwed into the tree and looked a bit weathered and worn.

“The woman had a big smile on her face – and the man looked pleased with himself too.

“It was just so bizarre and not something you expect to see on an afternoon walk.

Whoever left them there wanted them to stay there as they had screws in the tree.

“It’s shocking as kids and families go for walks around those woods.

“The mind boggles as to why they were put there. We were stunned at first but had to laugh as we walked back to our car.”

A sign at the entrance to the National Lottery-funded woods says “Trees are our future… help us care for them.”

Pornographic images nailed to a tree.
Jonny Dillon
The images were screwed into the tree[/caption]
A grassy field with a fence and trees in the background.
Jonny Dillon
Hameldon Woods is supposedly a ‘magnet’ for walkers, bikers, and families[/caption]
Wooded area with leafless trees.
Jonny Dillon
The walkers said they had no idea why they were put there[/caption]

Read More »

‘No one is above the law’ Prince Harry’s visa fight is ‘concerning’ – Donald Trump won’t give up, reveals royal expert

PRINCE Harry’s visa fight is “concerning” and “no one is above the law”, a royal expert has claimed.

A judge ruled last year that The Duke of Sussex‘s visa documents would not be made public despite his admission that he took drugs.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry posing for photos.
AP
Prince Harry’s visa fight is ‘concerning’, a royal expert has claimed[/caption]
President Donald Trump in a bilateral meeting.
EPA
Donald Trump previously vowed if he was voted back into office that ‘Harry is on his own’[/caption]

His reference to taking cocaine, marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms in his book Spare prompted a conservative Washington, DC think tank to question why he was allowed into the US in 2020.

And in this week’s episode of The Sun’s Royal Exclusive, News.com.au’s Royal Reporter Bronte Coy said his visa fight is “concerning”.

She said: “The new US President has made no secret about his position on it. He’s been asked about it so many times over the years.

“I genuinely believe Donald Trump has much more important things to be dealing with.

“But it’s probably something that’s not going away especially as it continues to get this attention.

“I think that in itself will be concerning because The Heritage Foundation, who is the one pushing to have the application made public, has also lobbied and urged Donald Trump to intervene.

“It has said this is about accountability and no one is above the law which is also concerning if they maintain that level of profile on the case.”

The newly elected president previously vowed if he was voted back into office that “Harry is on his own”.

In a major boost for the 40-year-old, Judge Carl Nichols said Harry had a “reasonable privacy interest” in relation to his US immigration paperwork and therefore it should stay private.

The judge did, however, agree Harry had revealed “intimate details” of his life in his memoir – which included a description of his private parts freezing.

And Harry’s privacy interests were somewhat diminished by him being a public figure, the judge said.

The decision comes after Judge Nichols spent five months reviewing Harry’s immigration file as part of a case brought by the Heritage Foundation.

The organisation sued the Department of Homeland Security after it refused a Freedom of Information request to see immigration files on Harry — now a US resident.

Heritage claims Harry may have lied on the forms under the section which asks if you have been a drug user.

In his ruling seen in court documents, Judge Nichols said “the public does not have a strong interest in disclosure of the duke’s immigration records”.

His judgement added: “Like any foreign national, the duke has a legitimate privacy interest in his immigration status.

“And the duke’s public statements about his travel and drug use did not disclose, and therefore did not eliminate his interest in keeping private, specific information regarding his immigration status, applications, or other materials.”

Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme – Sun Club.

How the Royal drama gripped UK and beyond

JAN 8, 2020: The Duke and Duchess of Sussex announce they are to “step back as senior members” of the Royal Family and divide their time between the UK and North America.

JAN 18: Buckingham Palace announces an agreement has been reached for Harry “to step back from royal duties, including official military appointments”.

JAN 20: The Palace announces Harry and Meghan will no longer use their HRH titles and will not receive public funds for royal duties. The couple say they intend to repay £2.4million of taxpayer money for the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage, which will remain their UK family home.

MAR 3: Harry and the Queen meet for a four-hour conversation about Megxit.

MAR 9: Meghan and Harry attend the Commonwealth Day service – alongside William and Kate –their final royal event before giving up royal duties.

MAR 27: The couple move to Los Angeles after a brief stay in Canada.

JUNE: They buy an £11million mansion in Montecito, California.

SEPT: Netflix announces a huge $100million deal with the couple.

NOV: In an article in the New York Times, Meghan reveals she suffered a miscarriage four months earlier.

MAR 7, 2021: The couple give a US TV interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which the Duchess reveals her suicidal thoughts and accuses a member of the Royal Family of racism.

MAR 8: The Palace responds, saying the race issues raised are “concerning” and “while some recollections may vary” the matters will be “taken very seriously”.

APR 17: Harry attends the funeral of his grandfather the Duke of Edinburgh.

JUNE 4: Daughter Lilibet is born in a hospital in Santa Barbara, California.

JULY 1: Harry and William unite to unveil a statue of Diana at Kensington Palace.

JUNE 2022: The brothers come together for the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations, and again two months later for her funeral. The state occasion is Meghan’s final visit to the UK.

DEC: Netflix series Harry & Meghan airs. The Duke says in one episode it had been “terrifying” to have his brother “scream and shout” at him about their future.

JAN 8, 2023: Harry is interviewed by ITV to publicise his controversial book Spare – published two days later – claiming it was “Meghan versus Kate”.

APR: Harry has a “heart-to-heart” talk with dad Charles before agreeing to attend the King’s Coronation in London.

MAY 6: Arriving alone for the ceremony, he sits two rows behind his brother and leaves soon after the service.

JUNE: Harry becomes the first senior royal in more than 130 years to give evidence in court, when he appears at the High Court for his case against Mirror Group Newspapers.

JULY: Streaming giant Spotify announces it is parting ways with the Suss-exes’ Archewell Audio brand, above, in a “mutual decision”.

SEPT: Harry rejects an offer to spend the anniversary of the Queen’s death with his father at Balmoral.

FEB 2024: Harry flies to the UK to be with his father. They meet for half an hour before Harry flies home. He does not meet William.

MAR: Meghan launches lifestyle brand American Riviera Orchard, which posts just nine times on Instagram.

APR: A judge brands Harry’s legal appeal for taxpayer-funded security following his move abroad “frankly hopeless”.

MAY: Harry pays a brief visit to London for an event held two miles from where Charles was staying. They do not meet.

JAN 1, 2025: Meghan relaunches her Instagram account with a video shot by Harry on a beach near their US home.

a man stands at a podium that says the halo trust
AFP
His visa documents will remain private, a judge previously ruled[/caption]
a man with a beard wears a black suit and tie
Reuters
Prince Harry has courted controversy over his drug admissions in a visa row[/caption]

Read More »